Which Borrowers are Suited to April Mortgages

Which Borrowers Are Suited to April Mortgages? Eligibility, affordability, lending criteria and mortgage options.

Which Borrowers are Suited to April Mortgages: April Mortgages was designed for borrowers who valued longer-term payment certainty but still wanted flexibility.

Its proposition included longer-term fixed rates, uncapped overpayments and automatic rate reductions when the mortgage entered a lower eligible loan-to-value band. Certain early repayment charge exemptions also applied when moving home or repaying with the borrower’s own funds.

The product structure could suit creditworthy buyers with stable income and longer-term ownership plans. However, borrower type alone did not establish suitability. Advisers still needed to assess affordability, deposit position, future plans, property eligibility and total borrowing costs.

What Defined an April Mortgages Customer?

An April Mortgages customer was not defined by age, profession or family status alone.

The stronger indicator was how the borrower wanted their mortgage to work.

A potentially suitable customer generally valued:

  • A fixed mortgage rate lasting longer than a typical short-term deal
  • Predictable monthly payments
  • The ability to make uncapped overpayments
  • Flexibility when moving home
  • A rate that could reduce after entering a lower eligible LTV band
  • Less dependence on repeated short-term refinancing

This made the proposition relevant to several borrower groups. However, every recommendation remained subject to affordability, creditworthiness, property criteria and individual suitability.

First-Time Buyers With Stable Income

Some first-time buyers could afford monthly mortgage payments but struggled to build a deposit while paying rent.

By July 2025, April Mortgages had introduced a no-deposit option for qualifying borrowers. It combined a 100% LTV structure with longer-term fixed rates and detailed affordability and credit checks.

This did not make the product suitable for every first-time buyer.

Advisers needed to consider:

  • Whether the applicant had stable and sustainable income
  • The strength of the applicant’s recent credit history
  • Whether repayments remained affordable after other commitments
  • The client’s likely ownership period
  • The risk of negative equity
  • Whether a smaller deposit could provide a wider product choice

A 100% LTV mortgage leaves the borrower with no initial equity contribution. Falling property values could therefore place the borrower in negative equity, particularly during the early years.

Home Movers Expecting Future Changes

A longer-term fixed rate might appear restrictive when a client expects to move again. However, April’s ERC structure was intended to provide greater movement flexibility in defined circumstances.

This could make the proposition relevant to borrowers who expected:

  • A future work relocation
  • A larger home after starting a family
  • A later move closer to relatives
  • A change in schooling requirements
  • A future downsize

Advisers still needed to check the precise treatment of a move, repayment source and any replacement borrowing.

An ERC exemption should not be treated as permission to ignore the client’s future plans. It is one part of the suitability assessment, not the whole assessment.

Borrowers Planning Regular Overpayments

April’s uncapped overpayment feature could suit borrowers expecting to repay more than the contracted monthly amount.

Potential examples included clients receiving:

  • Annual bonuses
  • Irregular commission
  • Future salary increases
  • Maturing savings
  • Family gifts
  • Proceeds from another permitted source

Overpayments could reduce the mortgage balance and total interest charged. They might also move the mortgage into a lower eligible LTV band.

Under April’s product structure, the rate could then reduce automatically. This was different from a conventional fixed rate that normally remained unchanged throughout its fixed period.

However, the borrower had to cross an applicable LTV threshold. A small balance reduction would not necessarily trigger an immediate rate change.

Borrowers Seeking Longer-Term Payment Certainty

Some clients preferred to avoid reviewing their mortgage every two or five years.

Longer-term fixed rates could reduce exposure to short-term market movements and provide a known basis for household budgeting.

This could be relevant for:

  • Families managing several regular commitments
  • Borrowers approaching a change in income
  • Self-employed applicants seeking predictable housing costs
  • Homeowners who valued stability over frequent product switching

Certainty still carried a trade-off. A borrower could remain on the agreed structure while new market rates moved lower.

Advisers therefore needed to compare flexibility, total cost and future plans rather than focusing only on the initial rate.

Who Might Not Have Suited the Proposition?

April Mortgages was not automatically suitable for every borrower seeking certainty.

The proposition may have been less appropriate for clients who:

  • Expected to sell the property within a short period
  • Wanted a conventional two-year or five-year product
  • Could not meet the lender’s credit requirements
  • Had uncertain or unsustainable income
  • Needed a property or loan type outside the lender’s criteria
  • Prioritised the lowest initial rate above longer-term certainty
  • Had not considered the risks attached to high-LTV borrowing

Interest-only, part-and-part and other specialist requirements also needed to be checked against the criteria available at the time. Product availability should never be assumed from a general borrower profile.

Adviser Checks Before Recommending April Mortgages

Before making a recommendation, advisers should establish:

  1. How long does the client expect to own the property?
  2. Why does the client prefer a longer-term fixed rate?
  3. Could the client’s income or household structure change?
  4. Does the client intend to make overpayments?
  5. What would happen if property values fell?
  6. Does the property meet the lender’s requirements?
  7. How does the total cost compare with suitable alternatives?
  8. Does the client understand when an ERC could still apply?

A product feature becomes useful only when it addresses a documented client need. Good advice connects the mechanism of the mortgage with the borrower’s likely future circumstances.

Accessing April Mortgages Through Connect

Connect advisers can review the current process, referral route and supporting information on the dedicated April Mortgages broker access page.

Advisers can also read how April Mortgages joined the Connect lender panel.

Borrowers who need regulated mortgage advice can use the UK mortgage adviser directory to search for advisers by location, language and mortgage experience.

Advisers seeking broader lender access, compliance support and case-placement assistance can explore joining the Connect Network.

Explore April Mortgages through Connect

April Mortgages Joins Connect hero image featuring the April logo on a navy blue background with the tagline “mortgage more simple”.

Frequently Asked Questions

Was April Mortgages only for first-time buyers?

No. Its longer-term fixed-rate structure could also be considered for home movers and remortgage customers, subject to the relevant product and criteria.

Did the mortgage rate reduce every month?

Not necessarily. A rate reduction depended on the mortgage entering a lower eligible LTV band under the applicable product terms.

Could customers make unlimited overpayments?

April’s proposition included uncapped overpayments using permitted funds. Advisers still needed to confirm the current product conditions before making a recommendation.

Did April Mortgages charge early repayment charges?

Certain ERC exemptions applied when moving home or repaying with the borrower’s own funds. Advisers needed to explain the exact conditions and identify circumstances where a charge could still apply.

Was the 100% LTV option suitable for every renter?

No. Applicants needed to meet the lender’s affordability, income, credit and property requirements. Advisers also needed to explain negative equity and compare suitable lower-LTV alternatives.


This article describes the proposition available around its original publication date of 27 July 2025. Mortgage products, rates and lending criteria can change. Advisers should confirm current information before discussing or recommending a product.